Review workflow

Create a safe review checklist for Mars Market links

A short checklist reduces missed steps and keeps every review focused on evidence rather than confidence or visual familiarity.

Editorial scope: This independent guide explains verification methods and does not publish or route readers to a claimed Mars Market URL, mirror, onion or transaction destination.

A short checklist reduces missed steps and keeps every review focused on evidence rather than confidence or visual familiarity.

Write down the exact claim

Capture the claimed role, source and publication date before evaluating the destination.

This prevents a mirror or historical reference from being mislabeled as a primary address.

Check the source chain

Find the earliest attributable statement and distinguish independent confirmation from copied repetition.

Mark the claim pending when the original source is missing.

Review principle: Treat every Mars Market address claim as time-bound evidence. Do not publish or follow a destination until its source, role and current context are independently documented.

Review domain and transport signals

Compare spelling, DNS context, certificate history, redirects and HTTP responses.

Treat each technical signal as supporting context rather than identity proof.

Compare page-level metadata

Check canonical, Open Graph, structured data and visible update dates for consistency.

Mismatches should be documented before a status changes.

Record a dated outcome

State what was checked, the evidence limitations and the next review trigger.

A repeatable record is more valuable than an unsupported permanent label.